CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
SECOND EDITION
PART THREE,
SECTION TWO,
CHAPTER TWO,
ARTICLE 5
2258 "Human life is
sacred because from its beginning it involves the creative action of God
and it remains for ever in a special relationship with the Creator, who is
its sole end. God alone is the Lord of life from its beginning until its
end: no one can under any circumstance claim for himself the right directly
to destroy an innocent human being."56
I. RESPECT FOR HUMAN
LIFE
The witness of sacred history
2259 In the account of
Abel's murder by his brother Cain,57 Scripture reveals the
presence of anger and envy in man, consequences of original sin, from the
beginning of human history. Man has become the enemy of his fellow man. God
declares the wickedness of this fratricide: "What have you done? The voice
of your brother's blood is crying to me from the ground. And now you are
cursed from the ground, which has opened its mouth to receive your brother's
blood from your hand."58
2260 The covenant
between God and mankind is interwoven with reminders of God's gift of human
life and man's murderous violence:
- For your
lifeblood I will surely require a reckoning. . . . Whoever sheds the
blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for God made man in his
own image.59
The Old Testament always considered
blood a sacred sign of life.60 This teaching remains necessary
for all time.
2261 Scripture
specifies the prohibition contained in the fifth commandment: "Do not slay
the innocent and the righteous."61 The deliberate murder of an
innocent person is gravely contrary to the dignity of the human being, to
the golden rule, and to the holiness of the Creator. The law forbidding it
is universally valid: it obliges each and everyone, always and everywhere.
2262 In the Sermon on
the Mount, the Lord recalls the commandment, "You shall not kill,"62
and adds to it the proscription of anger, hatred, and vengeance. Going
further, Christ asks his disciples to turn the other cheek, to love their
enemies.63 He did not defend himself and told Peter to leave his
sword in its sheath.64
Legitimate defense
2263 The legitimate
defense of persons and societies is not an exception to the prohibition
against the murder of the innocent that constitutes intentional killing.
"The act of self-defense can have a double effect: the preservation of one's
own life; and the killing of the aggressor. . . . The one is intended, the
other is not."65
2264 Love toward
oneself remains a fundamental principle of morality. Therefore it is
legitimate to insist on respect for one's own right to life. Someone who
defends his life is not guilty of murder even if he is forced to deal his
aggressor a lethal blow:
- If a man in
self-defense uses more than necessary violence, it will be unlawful:
whereas if he repels force with moderation, his defense will be lawful.
. . . Nor is it necessary for salvation that a man omit the act of
moderate self-defense to avoid killing the other man, since one is bound
to take more care of one's own life than of another's.66
2265 Legitimate defense
can be not only a right but a grave duty for one who is responsible for the
lives of others. The defense of the common good requires that an unjust
aggressor be rendered unable to cause harm. For this reason, those who
legitimately hold authority also have the right to use arms to repel
aggressors against the civil community entrusted to their responsibility.
2266 The efforts of the
state to curb the spread of behavior harmful to people's rights and to the
basic rules of civil society correspond to the requirement of safeguarding
the common good. Legitimate public authority has the right and duty to
inflict punishment proportionate to the gravity of the offense. Punishment
has the primary aim of redressing the disorder introduced by the offense.
When it is willingly accepted by the guilty party, it assumes the value of
expiation. Punishment then, in addition to defending public order and
protecting people's safety, has a medicinal purpose: as far as possible, it
must contribute to the correction of the guilty party.67
2267 Assuming that the
guilty party's identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the
traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death
penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human
lives against the unjust aggressor.
If, however, non-lethal means are
sufficient to defend and protect people's safety from the aggressor,
authority will limit itself to such means, as these are more in keeping with
the concrete conditions of the common good and more in conformity to the
dignity of the human person.
Today, in fact, as a consequence of
the possibilities which the state has for effectively preventing crime, by
rendering one who has committed an offense incapable of doing harm - without
definitely taking away from him the possibility of redeeming himself - the
cases in which the execution of the offender is an absolute necessity "are
very rare, if not practically nonexistent."68
STATEMENTS BY CATHOLIC
BISHOPS
Responsibility, Rehabilitation, and Restoration:
A Catholic Perspective on Crime and Criminal Justice
A
Statement of the Catholic Bishops of the United States, 2000.
Let Mercy and Justice Meet: Crime, Punishment
and the Common Good
A Statement of the Louisiana Conference of Catholic Bishops, 2002.
A Catholic Perspective on Crime
and Criminal Justice
A Statement of the Catholic Bishops of Kentucky, 2005.
The Catholic
Bishops of the South:
A Series of Eight Pastoral Letters on Criminal Justice
-
Challenges for the Criminal Justice Process in
the South
-
Wardens from Wall Street: Prison Privatization
-
"Suffer the Little Children..." Juvenile Justice
in the South
-
"I have come to heal..." Restorative Justice
-
Prison Conditions
-
Post Release from Prison
-
Women in Prison
- A
Call To Action
RestoreJustice.com
is an outreach of the California Catholic Conference offering healing and
support to everyone affected by the criminal justice system throughout the
U.S. The site is made possible by a grant from the Catholic Campaign for
Human Development at the United States Catholic Conference of Bishops.
Restorative
Justice On Line
is a comprehensive non-denominational
resources with an excellent collection of full text electronic documents.
Justice
Fellowship Resources
is a non-profit on-line community of Christians, founded in 1983 as a
subsidiary of Prison Fellowship Ministries, working to reform the criminal
justice system to reflect biblically based principles of restorative justice
for America's criminal justice system.
Catholic Worker
Bookstore on Restorative Justice
Restorative Justice Bibliography from the Missouri Coalition