On Campus BMP Research
Villanova Historic Seepage Pits
 
 
Soil Testing Results
 

Soil samples for all the testing described below were obtained from holes inside each pit and one hole located in between the pits (null). The soil beneath the pits is a silty sand (SM) according to the Unified Soil Classification System. In addition to classifying the soils, the following tests were performed:

  • Bacteria
  • Copper
  • Total Carbon
  • Total Nitrogen
  • Cation Exchange Capacity
  • pH
  • Infiltration rate

Only the results of the bacterial, copper, and infiltration testing are presented here. Complete results can be found in Matthew Gore's thesis, which will be posted on the VUSP website soon.  

Biological Testing Results

Understanding that a sewer line had been connected to the Monastery seepage pit, data needed to be gathered to determine whether the system would be a safe environment for a study. The results for the two pits, plus a control site located in between the two pits, are shown below at a depth of 6 inches. Total coliforms and some e-coli coliforms were found. Because bacteria were also found in the null site, it can be concluded that the bacteria occur naturally in the soil and that the site presented no health and safety problems.

Monastery
0.1/50 ml
1.0/50 ml
10/50 ml
coliforms
40
150
500
e-coli coliforms
3
7
30
total
43
157
530
Tolentine
 
 
 
coliforms
80
212
500
e-coli coliforms
0
11
65
total
80
223
565
Null
 
 
 
coliforms
5
147
500
e-coli coliforms
0
0
6
total
5
147
506

Copper Testing Results

Copper entered the pits from the copper gutters, downspouts, and sheathing used on the rooftops. While elevated levels of copper were found in the pits as compared to the null site, the soil in the pits would still be considered clean fill by the PADEP.

Infitration Testing Results

The infiltration rate was determined for both the Tolentine and Monastery pits. The infiltration rate of the Tolentine pit was excellent; unfortunately, there are no easily accessible lines to connect to this pit. The infiltration rate of the Monastery pit was low and we investigated a plan to restore the infiltration rate using earthquake drains.

 

Top left - Earthquake Drain Manufactured by Nilex

Top right - Earthquake Drain Installation

 Unfortunately, there was not much improvement in the infiltration rate after the earthquake drain installation as can be seen in the figure below which compares the infiltration rates at a head of 0.76 m.

Although we are unable to say definitively why there was no improvement in the infiltration rate, we believe there are two possible explanations. First, the most logical explanation is that the deeper soil is not any more permeable than the upper soils. Second, we were only able to install one out of four drains because of the size of the entryway into the pit. It is our opinion that more would be required to see a change in the infiltration rate. We still believe that an earthquake drain can be effective if the infiltration rate is being compromised by a low hydraulic conductivity layer at the surface.